data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90377/90377b41c04065b36ab625dc8cec9106308a4cde" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6310c/6310cffe0c727e4f820863f6cb72520c290720a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/caef4/caef4b87e9e3279d2743e46ef66c41de0f599a89" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1db2f/1db2fed960b98d2c4540365b105c316b0f5ccb0d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94482/944824b85cf27fb7bc0473f4d48aadf9e2b9d4f5" alt=""
Now it's all patched up. The heavy corrosion was localized around the area where the stainless coil entered the plastic filter box (see top picture) . My guess is that vibration from the pump caused the rough surface of the plastic to abrade the passivated layer on the stainless, thus causing a localized spot where the metal was unprotected. I've heard that passivated the stainless in an acid bath can create a stronger, more uniform passive layer. There are two common acids used to passivate stainless: nitric and citric. Nitric acid is nasty stuff, and it's possible to damage the stainless parts if the procedure is done incorrectly. Citric acid seems to be just as effective as nitric, and it's non-toxic. Here is the best reference on citric acid passivation:
http://www.astropak.com/downloads/technical_papers/boeing_passivation.pdf
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20810/208103c3d78577ff1b29009dba4bf721aba17041" alt=""
I've put the coil back into the aquarium, and added some silicone pads to the filter box so that the plastic would not scrape away at the stainless coil. I'll keep you updated to see how effective it is.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteHi Ben, I read your whole post and found it very interesting and no doubt you have did great job. Also agree with you that citric acid is great option instead of nitric acid as both delivers the same properties.
ReplyDelete